Jenny Duerst vs Olivia Gram Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How do Duerst and Gram fare when the going gets tough, and they're forced to rely on their second serve? In recent months, Duerst has been more reliable, winning 37.89% of points on her second serve compared to Gram's 30.25%. This difference can often be critical when predicting match outcomes.

Meanwhile, their ability to return serves also highlights some intriguing contrasts. Duerst has claimed 46.68% of points on her opponent's second serves, whereas Gram has managed 51.96%. In terms of first serve returns, Duerst's performance shines brighter, securing 32.53% of such points, while Gram trails at 18.32%. When considering head-to-head predictions, these numbers become significantly telling.

Under pressure, particularly during break point scenarios, Duerst again holds a slight edge. She has successfully saved 46.61% of break points, overshadowing the 42.55% success rate of Gram. For those looking to guide their bets, this information can be invaluable.

When reviewing their performances over the past year, Duerst's dominance is evident, having won 70.83% of her matches (with a win-loss record of 51/21) compared to Gram's 36.36% (8/14). Even their choice of surfaces reveals some differences. Duerst has her strongest win record on hard surfaces, boasting a 61% win rate, whereas Gram's best is notably lower at 35%. Indoor hard courts seem to be less favorable for both, with Gram yet to claim a victory.

Delving deeper into the levels of tournaments they frequent, Duerst's prowess on the Challenger/ITF circuit is apparent, winning 66.67% of her matches. Gram lags behind with a 23.08% success rate, hinting at a disparity in their competitive stature and ambitions. Historical data also provides insight: Duerst has emerged victorious in their sole previous encounter, dismantling Gram 6-1, 6-0 at the W 60 Vitoria-Gasteiz.

If the match extends into an exhaustive deciding set, Duerst might need to tap into her recent form where she has won 62% of such situations. Nevertheless, Gram edges her out slightly here, winning 67% of deciding sets over the past year. However, this might not be enough to tilt the scales in her favor.

Last but not least, when capitalizing on break point opportunities, Duerst again appears superior, converting 37.97% of chances as opposed to Gram's 22.22%. This decisive ability to close out games when opponents are on the ropes makes Duerst a strong favorite. Given all these factors, it seems likely that Duerst will prevail in their upcoming clash, extending her dominance in their head-to-head matchups.